Diesen v. Hessburg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentYetka, Justice
I would affirm the court of appeals because I believe it was correct in upholding *457a special jury verdict of the trial court which found that:
1. An article published by the Duluth News Tribune was defamatory to Diesen;
2. The implication of the article was substantially false;
3. Diesen demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that the article was published with reckless disregard for the truth; and
4. The article was published willfully, maliciously and with intent to harm Diesen.
The article was written by appellant, John Hessburg, who was hired by the Duluth News Tribune in February 1981.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.