Legal Opinion · Dissent

Foley v. WCCO Television, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 1989No. C0-89-1225Published

1DissentRandall, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I do not find this complicated case at this time, on this record, appropriate for disposition by a Rule 12 motion for judgment on the pleadings and/or summary judgment.

The voluminous record contains numerous disputed fact issues and allegations by appellant that key facts were known, but omitted or slanted. Appellant argues vigorously that a jury is entitled to see the entire picture, and that if they resolve certain inferences in his favor actual malice could be found. There are several key areas in dispute. What did appellant actually know; what did appellant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Memphis Publishing Co. v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Fleckenstein v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API