Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Murphy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1982No. 2457-2458PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

This is a Commonwealth appeal from a pre-trial order dismissing all charges against the defendants, Philadelphia police detectives Robert Murphy and John Filler, on the ground that their due process rights were violated by a *248pre-arrest delay of 32 months. We vacate the order, reinstate all charges, and remand for disposition of defendants’ other pre-trial motions which remain outstanding.

The charges1 against detectives Murphy and Filler arose out of an alleged beating of Amos Singleton on December 23, 1975, after a preliminary hearing held at the 14th police district on robbery…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Wiegand v. WiegandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. United States v. FinkelsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MontalvoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. GreerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. AkersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. BroadieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API