Legal Opinion
Diesel Service Company v. Ambac International Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 8, 1992No. 91-1204PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILL, Senior District Judge.
“We review the district court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo and utilize the same standard of decision making as that employed by the district court.” McMillian v. Svetanoff, 878 F.2d 186 (7th Cir.1989). Summary judgment is granted if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). In this case there are no disputes about relevant facts, only issues of law are disputed. The facts, in the light most…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Healy v. Beer InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heath v. ZellmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Harriett L. McMillian v. Gerald N. Svetanoff, JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Eljer Manufacturing, Incorporated v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois, Intervening-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Hystro Products, Inc. v. Mnp CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. Nabors Drilling USA, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Morley-Murphy Co. v. Zenith Electronics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Baldewein Co. v. Tri-Clover, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.