Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1929No. Docket No. 15, Calendar No. 32,087PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, C. J.

A decree of divorce was granted to plaintiff February 20, 1901. It contained a pro vision requiring the defendant to pay the plaintiff $200 within one year thereafter. Payment has not been made, and plaintiff now seeks to enforce it by contempt proceedings. Her petition was filed on the 18th day of November, 1922, and heard in February, 1925. The relief sought was denied by the trial judge on the ground that the plaintiff was “not entitled by reason of the great lapse of time to the equitable favor of the court.” The plaintiff has appealed.

Over 20 years elapsed between the time payment was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zoellner v. ZoellnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Stone v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rybinski v. RybinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Chipman v. ChipmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Sullivan v. SullivanMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Piacquadio v. PiacquadioConnecticut Superior Court · 1960
  5. Schumacher v. SchumacherWashington Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API