Schumacher v. Schumacher
Washington Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceSteinert, J.
(concurring in the result) — I agree with the result reached by the majority in this case, but have arrived at my conclusion for reasons different from those expressed in the majority opinion.
The order of February 10,1939, modifying the decree and fixing the amount of the monthly payments at twenty dollars, made no provision that such payments should in •any part be applied to delinquent installments. In the light of the circumstances of this case, I think both respondent and appellant would be fully justified in assuming that the payments provided for were directed to current support for…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Herzog v. HerzogWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Marshall v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Kimble v. KimbleWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- McKee v. McKeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Harris v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1912
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.