Legal Opinion

Michigan State Bank v. Trowbridge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Osceola. (Judkins, J.) Bill to foreclose a mortgage. Defendants Monfort and Bowers appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.

The bill in this case is filed to foreclose a mortgage given by the - defendant Mida Trowbridge to Franklin P. Monfort, upon premises in the village of Evart, Osceola county, in this State.- This mortgage was assigned by Monfort to John H. Stirling and William F. Stirling, who, on the 21st day of January, 1889, assigned the same to—

“ Charles S. Cobb, cashier of thá Michigan State Bank of Eaton Eapids, Mich., * * * as collateral security to a note of $1,000, this day given by Stirling & Co. to second party, and any renewal of the same, or of parts of same, and, when such indebtedness is paid,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cook v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Garton v. Union City National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Robbins v. BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. Detroit Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Halbach v. TresterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Miller v. McLaughlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Nachtegall v. ReilleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Bennett v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API