Legal Opinion

Holbrook v. Burrell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1982No. 64068PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

“Termite case.” Appellants brought suit against appellee exterminator claiming damages based upon appellee’s allegedly negligent termite inspection and fraudulent failure to reveal termite infestation to appellants. As a condition precedent to appellants’ purchase of a certain house, the seller was required to furnish to appellants “a termite certificate stating [that the] house is free of any termites.” Appellee was employed by the seller and paid by appellants for this purpose. Appellee conducted the inspection and presented the realtor with a “Subterranean Termite Control…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Orkin Exterminating Co. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Worth v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Allred v. DobbsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Wilcher v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Butler v. Terminix International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Getz Services, Inc. v. PerloeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. McCoy v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Casper v. Harrison Hatchery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API