Legal Opinion

Allred v. Dobbs

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 7, 1976No. 51185PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stolz, Judge.

The present appeal arises from a judgment sustaining the defendants’ motions for directed verdict to the plaintiffs three-count complaint for damages. The plaintiff purchased a house from defendants Ivan Dobbs and Christine Bowling Dobbs which was the subject of a termite inspection by defendant Scott Exterminating Company, Inc. (Scott). The plaintiffs complaint alleges in Count 1 a tort action against the Dobbses based on fraud in the concealment of termite damage allegedly existing at the time of the sale, in Count 2 a tort action against Scott based on the negligent inspection…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Orkin Exterminating Co. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Southern v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. E. & M. Construction Co., Inc. v. BobCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Sherrill v. Louisville Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lively v. GarnickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Butler v. Terminix International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Smiley v. S & J INVESTMENTS, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1981
  5. Plantation Pipe Line Co. v. 3-D Excavators, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API