Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chinese Consol. Benev. Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 6, 1941No. 232Published
1Opinion of the Court
120 F.2d 738 (1941)
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
v.
CHINESE CONSOL. BENEV. ASS'N, Inc.
No. 232.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 6, 1941.
Chester T. Lane, of Washington, D. C., Gen. Counsel, Christopher M. Jenks and John F. Davis, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Milton V. Freeman, and Orrin C. Knudsen, all of Washington, D. C., for Securities and Exchange Commission, complainant-appellant.
Chadbourne, Hunt, Jaeckel & Brown and Gerald B. O'Neill, all of New York City (William M. Chadbourne and John Holbrook, both of New York City, of counsel), for Chinese Consol. Benev. Ass'n Inc.,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. TorrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chinese Consol. Benev. Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Associated Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. TorrDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
- Link, Petter & Co. v. PollieMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.