Legal Opinion
Flynn v. Haas Bros.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 27, 1927No. 5102PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This was an action at law by Haas Bros., a corporation, to recover certain additional income and profit taxes imposed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. A jury was waived by written stipulation of the parties, and the case has been brought here for review on the special findings made by the court below, from which it appears:
That the plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of California, engaged in the wholesale grocery business in the city and county of San Francisco, and is and always has been a close family corporation; that until his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Douglas v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Eaton v. English & Mersick Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sharp v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. Public Utilities Commission of District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. GlennDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
- Commissioner of Internal Rev. v. Columbia Pacific S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.