Legal Opinion
Eaton v. English & Mersick Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 13, 1925No. 288PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge
(after stating
the facts as above). This aetion was tried on an agreed statement of facts supplemented by the testimony of two witnesses who between them held the whole' of the stock of the plaintiff corporation, with the exception of a qualifying share held by a third person. These two witnesses were called on behalf of the plaintiff, and their testimony is uneonlradieted. No witnesses were called by the defendant. There is no disputes as to the facts.
The plaintiff is engaged in manufacturing carriage hardware and supplies. The business was carried on. for many years under a partnership, but…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. MerriamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Shwab v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Edson v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- United States v. Rodney ArchambaultCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Geo Feick & Sons Co. v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
- United States v. Public Utilities Commission of District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Citrus Soap Co. of California v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.