Crow v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Judith Rogers, Judge.
This is an appeal from the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s decision finding that appellant failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he was entitled to receive permanent partial disability benefits. On appeal, appellant contends that the Commission erred in its interpretation and application of Ark. Code Ann. § 1 l-9-704(c)(l) (Supp. 1993) and that the Commission erred in not considering new evidence. We disagree on both points and affirm.
The record reflects that appellant sustained a compensable injury in the course and scope of his employment with…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Keller v. L. A. Darling FixturesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Moser v. Arkansas Lime Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Reeder v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Johnson v. American Pulpwood Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Cagle Fabricating and Steel, Inc. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hill v. Baptist Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Hill v. Baptist Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Foxx v. American TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
- Foxx v. American TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
- Gansky v. Hi-Tech EngineeringSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.