Foxx v. American Transportation
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1DissentJohn Mauzy Pittman, Judge
Today this court takes a stroll down the primrose path, lured by a disingenuous argument. By this decision, the majority holds that the Workers’ Compensation Commission cannot consider evidence demonstrating the absence of functional incapacity in determining whether or not a claimant has suffered any degree of permanent disability. In other words, it is being held that the issue of permanent functional or anatomical impairment is a question to be determined purely by expert medical testimony. The majority so holds based only on the dubious authority of two second injury fund cases that touch…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Glass v. EdensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Johnson v. General DynamicsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
- Reeder v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Johnson v. American Pulpwood Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Bibler Bros. v. IngramSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.