Legal Opinion · Dissent

Foxx v. American Transportation

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 19, 1996No. CA 95-218Published

1DissentJohn Mauzy Pittman, Judge

Today this court takes a stroll down the primrose path, lured by a disingenuous argument. By this decision, the majority holds that the Workers’ Compensation Commission cannot consider evidence demonstrating the absence of functional incapacity in determining whether or not a claimant has suffered any degree of permanent disability. In other words, it is being held that the issue of permanent functional or anatomical impairment is a question to be determined purely by expert medical testimony. The majority so holds based only on the dubious authority of two second injury fund cases that touch…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Glass v. EdensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Johnson v. General DynamicsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Reeder v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Johnson v. American Pulpwood Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Bibler Bros. v. IngramSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API