Legal Opinion

Gansky v. Hi-Tech Engineering

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 24, 1996No. 96-335Published

1Opinion of the Court

924 S.W.2d 790 (1996)

325 Ark. 163

Rick GANSKY, Appellant,

v.

HI-TECH ENGINEERING; ITT Hartford, Appellees.

No. 96-335.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

June 24, 1996.

Donald C. Pullen, Hot Springs, for appellant.

Randy P. Murphy, Little Rock, for appellees.

BROWN, Justice.

This matter comes to us on review of a decision by the Court of Appeals in which that court was divided by a vote of three to three. Gansky v. Hi-Tech Eng'g, 52 Ark. App. 147, 916 S.W.2d 124 (1996). Because the vote in the Court of Appeals was evenly split, the decision by the Workers' Compensation Commission to deny additional benefits to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gansky v. Hi-Tech EngineeringSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Plante v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Kuhn v. Majestic HotelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. ST. VINCENT INFIRMARY NEDICAL CENTER v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Gencorp Polymer Products v. LandersCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API