DeKrasner v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
It was not necessary to allege, in the indictment for attempting to commit the offense of cheating and swindling by false representations, that the person sought to be cheated and defrauded believed the statements and relied upon them, or that the money was parted with by the intended victim. This is true in an indictment for the actually-completed offense. The Code, § 27-2507, declares: “If any person shall attempt to commit a crime, and in such attempt shall do any act toward the commission of such crime, but shall fail in the perpetration thereof, or shall be prevented or intercepted from…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Groves v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Goddard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Norris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- People v. SpolascoNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Waller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Loomis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Everett v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.