Legal Opinion

Norris v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 31, 1929No. 19872PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. The court properly overruled the demurrer to the indictment.

2. Special ground 4 of the motion for a new trial alleges error “because the charge of the court as a whole is confusing to the jury and amounted to an expression of opinion by the court that the crime alleged in the bill of indictment had been committed by some one or some of the defendants, and that there has been a conspiracy by them or some of them to commit the crime alleged in the bill of indictment.” In Foote v. Kelley, 126 Ga. 799 (55 S. E. 1045), it was held: “The general exception to the entire charge of the court was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bond v. SullivanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Zipperer v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Gaskins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. DeKrasner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Holsenbeck v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  3. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Slater v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Southern Nitrogen Co. v. ManuelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API