Legal Opinion

Whitten v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1954PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

A proceeding for the incorporation of a village and a proceeding for the annexation of adjacent territory to a city are governed by statute. Conflicts have arisen in the past as to which proceeding has precedence. The general rule is stated in the case of In re Incorporation of Village of St. Francis, 208 Wis. 431, 436, 243 N. W. 315, as follows:

“Where the two proceedings are begun about the same time and in good faith, undoubtedly some reasonable arrangement can be made which would be more satisfactory to applicants than a dismissal of their proceeding; but the universal rule as gathered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Popenfus v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Madison v. WalshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Slidell v. ValentineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. Village of Brown Deer v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Village of Brown Deer v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. MAYOR, COUNCILMEN, ETC. v. Dealers Transport Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. Town of Clive v. ColbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API