Commonwealth v. Stair
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
The Court being evenly divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.
CAPPY, J., files an opinion in support of affirmance in which CASTILLE and NEWMAN, JJ., join. ZARPALA, J., files an opinion in support of reversal in which FLAHERTY, C.J., and NIGRO, J., join.
OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE
CAPPY, Justice:
The question presented in this appeal is whether a Pennsylvania State Police Trooper can lawfully administer the Implied Consent Law, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1547(a), 1 in another state to a driver who has been involved in an automobile accident while operating a vehicle in Pennsylvania.…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Com., Dept. of Transp. v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BeshoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- In re J.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. Bell, T., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- McKinley v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.