Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 2017No. Com. v. Bell, T. No. 1490 MDA 2016PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STEVENS, P.J.E.:

The Commonwealth appeals from the order entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming County awarding Ap-pellee Thomas S. Bell a new trial. The Commonwealth claims the trial court erred in finding that the prosecution’s admission of evidence of Appellee’s refusal to submit to a blood test at his trial on driving under the influence (DUI) charges violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches.

As we conclude that it is constitutionally permissible to deem motorists to have consented to the specific provision of Pennsylvania’s Implied…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Bell, T., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. State v. Shannon Rajda / State v. Albert Lee Lape, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  3. Com. v. Becher, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Com. v. Smith, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Com. v. Smith, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API