Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Beshore

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 2007PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

¶ 1 Jeffrey Beshore, Paul R. Imes, and Jan L. Neufeld (Appellants) appeal from the judgments of sentence imposed following their various convictions for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). On appeal, Appellants are all represented by the same attorney who has filed a brief in each case, presenting eleven identical issues supported by ostensibly verbatim argument from one brief to the next. We have reviewed all the issues and find many to be without merit and others waived. What follows are our reasons for affirming all the judgments of sentence, organized into…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CharlestonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. FreemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. KearneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. J.J. DeLuca Co. v. Toll Naval AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Milby, L. v. Pote, C. v. Southern ChristrianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API