Legal Opinion
Safari 300, Ltd. v. Hamilton Family Enterprises, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided June 14, 2007No. 06CA0065PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge TERRY.
In this appeal, we consider whether a corporate entity can be considered a public employee under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act (CGIA), § 24-10-101, et seq., C.R.8.2006, and conclude that it cannot.
Defendant Hamilton Family Enterprises, Ine. (HFE), which claims that it is a public employee under the CGIA, appeals the order denying its C.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss the complaint of plaintiffs, Safari 300 Ltd., Peggy Duckworth, and Allan Duck-worth, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.
I
In January 2004, HFE entered into a contract with the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ahmad Baravati v. Josephthal, Lyon & Ross, Incorporated, and Peter SheibCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Wood Bros. Homes, Inc. v. HowardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Cole v. HotzColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
- Timm Adams, Thomas Helicopters, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant, and E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Inc., Intervenors v. United States of America, Timm Adams v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Deangelo Brothers, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, United States of America, Timm Adams, E.I. Du Ponte De Nemours and Company, Inc., Intervenors, and Deangelo Brothers Inc., Intervenor-Appellant v. United States of America, Timm Adams, and Thomas Helicopters, Inc., an Idaho Corporation v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Ceja v. LemireSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Parental Responsibilities of A.D.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Moran v. Standard Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008