Legal Opinion

Olson v. Teck Cominco Alaska, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2006No. S-11755PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Richard Olson was employed at the Red Dog mine. He frequently missed work without justification, so his employer, Teck Com-ineo Alaska, Inc., placed him on a step discipline plan. Olson continued to miss work, and Teck Comineo fired him for violating the plan. But shortly before Teck Comineo took this action, Olson had filed a workers’ compensation claim alleging that he had been injured by exposure to lead on the job and needed to be treated for this condition. Teck Cominco’s insurer had conducted an independent medical examination, which concluded…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. French v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Veco, Inc. v. RosebrockAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Broderick v. King's Way Assembly of God ChurchAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. R.E. ex rel. D.E. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Tongass Sport Fishing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Prentzel v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Winschel v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kalenka v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Willard v. Khotol Services CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. HANDLE CONST. CO., INC. v. Norcon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API