Legal Opinion
Stolteben v. General Foods Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 20, 1948No. Civ. 36-157PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
This action by the plaintiff, a resident of Illinois, is brought against the defendant, a Delaware corporation, to recover damages sustained for alleged breach of a contract by the defendant to purchase 153,500 laminated water-proof bags [later referred to as “Triplex bags”]. It was tried before the court without a jury.
In the complaint it is alleged that an agreement for the purchase of the bags was entered into on or about April 16, 1945, and that the contract is contained in certain writings, copies of which are attached to the complaint, which further alleges that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Continental Can Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Swift & Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Katz v. Gordon Johnson CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1958
- Werfel v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948