Legal Opinion
Werfel v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 20, 1948No. Civ. 44-578PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
This is an action under the Tucker Act, Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(20) [now §§ 1346, 2401, 2402],
The plaintiff Abraham Werfel was a former member of the armed forces of this country and was classified as a priority purchaser under the rules and regulations of the War Assets Administration. On January 16, 1947 the defendant agency solicited offers from priority purchasers on various drug items at fixed prices. On January 17, 1947, this plaintiff submitted an offer to purchase “Bismuth’ Subcarbonate in five pound drums, 25 units at $6.75 each for a total of $168.75.” The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Devlin v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Henkels v. SutherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Allan Fox Co. v. WohlNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Mahlon C. MohrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- Mohr v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1959
- Standard Shipbuilding Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- Standard Shipbuilding Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955