Legal Opinion
Katz v. Gordon Johnson Company
District Court, D. Maine
Decided March 26, 1958No. Civ. A. 5-16PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIGNOUX, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon defendant’s motion to strike from the complaint all allegations with respect to special and consequential damages on the ground that such allegations are immaterial because plaintiff is not entitled to recover such damages in this action. Rule 12(f), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.
The principal action was brought by a New York resident against a Missouri corporation by writ of foreign attachment or trustee process dated August 9, 1956, returnable to the October, 1956, Term of the Superior Court, Cumberland County,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Sampson v. ChannellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Yoder v. Nu-Enamel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lincoln Pulp & Paper Co., Inc. v. Dravo Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1977
- Batchelder v. TweedieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- St. Jean v. Racal MortgageDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1997
- Dole Company v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1967
- United States ex rel. Arlmont Air Condition Corp. v. Premier Contractors, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.