Legal Opinion

TAY v. GREEN

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 19, 2022PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TAY v. GREEN

2022 OK 38

509 P.3d 615

Case Number: 119984; Comp. w/119927

Decided: 04/19/2022

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Cite as: 2022 OK 38, 509 P.3d 615

ORDER

Upon consideration of the respondents' Petition for Rehearing or Clarification filed on April 27, 2022, it is hereby ordered that the Petition for Rehearing or Clarification filed by the respondents be granted for the limited purpose of:

1) striking Section 4(15) of the Initiative Petition because it references, relies on and interrelates to Section 5 which we previously struck in Tay v. Green, 2022 OK 38;

2) striking the phrase…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Printz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1842

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. IN RE INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 448, STATE QUESTION NO. 836; THE OKLAHOMA REPUBLICAN PARTY v. SETTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API