Polaroid Corporation v. Eastman Kodak Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
Eastman Kodak Company (Kodak) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (Zobel, J.), holding claims of seven patents issued to Polaroid Corporation (Polaroid) valid and infringed. 228 USPQ 305, 344 (¿.Mass.1985). We affirm the appealed portions of the judgment in all respects.
I. Background
Polaroid sued Kodak on April 26, 1976 for infringement, 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), and for actively inducing infringement, 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), of ten Polaroid patents. The complaint requested issuance of temporary and permanent injunctions,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Atlas Powder Company v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company and Alamo Explosives Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corporation, Premix, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Pharmasterm Therapeutics, Inc. v. Viacell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Kloster Speedsteel AB v. Crucible Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Exmark Manufacturing Co. v. Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.