Legal Opinion

Miller Waste Mills, Inc. v. MacKay

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 16, 1994No. C4-94-75PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AMUNDSON, Judge.

Appellants Miller Waste Mills, Benjamin Miller, Hugh Miller and Charles Wunderlich challenge the district court’s order, which (1) grants respondents Helen Lou Kurtz and Carol Ann Mackay a writ of mandamus directing Miller Waste Mills to hold a shareholders’ meeting, (2) permits Kurtz and Mac-kay to vote shares from the Rudolph and Oscar Miller estates, and (3) enjoins Miller Waste Mills and its corporate board from repurchasing shares pursuant to its stock redemption provision. By notice of review, Kurtz and Mackay argue the district court erred by concluding Miller…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. Evans v. BlesiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Nationwide Corp. v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Estate of Meller v. Adolf Meller Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kortum v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Berreman v. West Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Mid-List Press v. NoraDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
  4. Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Roof Depot, Inc. v. OhmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API