Legal Opinion

Jester v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 1991No. 293 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, President Judge.

The issue the court must resolve is whether appointed counsel may withdraw his representation of a petitioner in a parole revocation appeal when the request to withdraw is based solely on petitioner’s desire to proceed pro se.

In this case, counsel’s petition to withdraw includes a copy of a letter from petitioner to appointed counsel in which petitioner adamantly states that he has a constitutional right to represent himself and that he does not wish appointed counsel to represent him in his parole revocation appeal. Counsel’s petition to withdraw does not allege that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Bronson v. Commonwealth Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ByingtonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  2. Com. v. Harding, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Com. v. Murphy, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Griggs v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API