Legal Opinion
In the Interest of D.M.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Parents appeal the trial court’s determination that there was good cause to deny the Rosebud Sioux Tribe’s (Tribe) motion to transfer termination proceedings under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). 25 USC § 1912(b). We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] This case is before the Court for the third time. The first time was in 2003, when Parents appealed an order terminating their parental rights.1 Mother is an enrolled member of the Rosebud Sioux Tribe and children in this case fall within the provisions of ICWA. In their first appeal, Parents argued in relevant part that the trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of Dependency and Neglect of ALSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- People in Interest of KCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. Human Services Department v. Wayne R.N.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Interest of J.L.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of D.M., R.M., III, and T.B.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Children of Shirley T.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- Matter of S.B.C. Jr.Montana Supreme Court · 2014
- People ex rel. T.I.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Interest of A.O., V.O. & C.O.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Raena R. v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.