Legal Opinion

People ex rel. T.I.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2005No. Nos. 23581, 23587 and 23597PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] In this abuse and neglect proceeding, governed by the provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), the circuit court declined transfer of jurisdiction to tribal court and terminated the mother and father’s parental rights. We affirm.

Background

[¶ 2.] The mother and father are the biological parents of T.I. (Son 1), born August 18, 1997, and T.I. (Son 2), born March 2, 1999. At the commencement of these proceedings, Son 1 was a member of the Yankton Sioux Tribe (YST) and Son 2 was eligible for enrollment in YST. Aso, both children were eligible for enrollment,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. In re M.E.M. Youth in Need of CareMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. SinnottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Child of Radience K.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  2. State, in the Interest of JihSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In re Children of Shirley T.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  4. In re Interest of Tavian B.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. In the Interest of J.L.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API