Legal Opinion

Interest of A.O., V.O. & C.O.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2017No. 27864; 27999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, Chief Justice

[¶1.] Law enforcement removed A.O., V.O., and C.O. (the Children) from the home of their mother, V.S.O. (Mother), after discovering methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia in the home. More than one year after the State initiated abuse-and-neglect proceedings against Mother, who is an enrolled member of the Oglala Sioux Tribe (the Tribe), the circuit court denied motions to transfer the case to the jurisdiction of the Tribe. Mother argues that the circuit court erred by denying the motions without holding an evi-dentiary hearing. We reverse and remand.

Facts and Procedural History

[¶2.] On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gartner v. TempleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Matter of Dependency and Neglect of ALSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. MacKaben v. MacKabenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. People in Interests of MCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In re G.L.O.C.Montana Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re PeopleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Interest of E.T.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Interest of C.R.W.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. In re E.T.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. In re M.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API