Legal Opinion
Collins Inkjet Corporation v. Eastman Kodak Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 16, 2015No. 14-3306PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J., joined by Donald, J.,
DAUGHTREY, J. (pg. 280-81), delivered a separate concurring opinion.
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
In a tying arrangement, a seller requires buyers of a product over which it has market power — the “tying product”— also to purchase a product over which it seeks to gain market power — the “tied product.” A tying arrangement can be prohibited under § 1 of the Sherman Act even if the tie is not explicit in the seller’s contracts, but instead is enforced through informal constraints or pricing policies. This appeal primarily concerns the question of when differential pricing — charging more for the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Viamedia, Incorporation v. Comcast CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Hall v. Edgewood Partners Insurance Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Aerotec International, Inc. v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Authenticom, Inc. v. CDK Global, LLC (In re Dealer Mgmt. Sys. Antitrust Litig.)District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Inline Packaging, LLC v. Graphic Packaging Int'l, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.