Legal Opinion

Reed v. Cornell

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 8, 1921No. Civ. No. 3803PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. J. Trabucco, Judge Presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

The plaintiff, as assignee, brought this action to recover the possession of- a certain piano. He alleged that the defendant had entered into an agreement with the Heine Piano Company, plaintiff’s assignor, for the purchase of the instrument; that payment had not been made as required by -the contract; that by reason of the violation of the terms of the agreement, plaintiff was entitled' to a return of the piano. The defendant denied any indebtedness, and alleged that the piano had been fully paid for, and asserted title in herself. Judgment was entered for the defendant from which the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tower v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Jacobs v. LudemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whann v. DoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Wallace v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. People v. WillisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Owens v. NobleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API