Legal Opinion

Coakley-Rivera v. City of Springfield

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided November 20, 2006No. 061010Published

1Opinion of the Court

Sweeney, Constance M., J.

In this action for declaratory relief, the plaintiffs ask the court to declare that the City of Springfield (“City”) under the guise of an annual trash collection fee is in fact imposing an illegal tax on property owners. The plaintiffs petition the court to enter interlocutory and permanent orders enjoining the City from engaging in an alleged illegal revenue raising scheme. The plaintiffs are ten property owners who pay real estate taxes to the City. Thus they have standing to bring this action, since the issue at bar falls comfortably within the provisions of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Emerson College v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Nuclear Metals, Inc. v. Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Southview Co-Operative Housing Corp. v. Rent Control Board of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Berry v. Town of DanversMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API