Ouradnik v. Ouradnik

OPINION

BRATVOLD, Judge

Appellant-son was hunting on respondent-father’s land and was injured while climbing into a deer stand. Appeal*302ing from a judgment, appellant challenges the district court’s decision granting partial summary judgment in favor of respondent. Appellant argues that the district court erred in its interpretation of Minn. Stat. § 604A.22, the recreational-use statute, and, as a result, erroneously instructed the jury on the duty of care. Because it is undisputed that respondent did not offer his hunting land for public use, we conclude the recreational-use statute does not…