Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Rose

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1982No. 811SC1312PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendants attack the refusal of the trial judge to allow them to amend their answer. Under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 15(a), amendment of a pleading after the time for pleading has expired is “only by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party, and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.” But an order denying a motion to amend pleadings is an interlocutory order, and is not immediately appealable. Calloway v. Ford Motor Co., 281 N.C. 496, 501, 189 S.E. 2d 484, 488 (1972). See also, O'Neill v. Bank, 40 N.C. App. 227, 230, 252 S.E. 2d 231, 234 (1979).

Although…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Calloway v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. O'Neill v. Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Funderburk v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Hudspeth v. BunzeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Hoots v. PryorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Carter v. Rockingham County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Alexander Hamilton Life Insurance v. J&H Marsh & McClennan, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Tiber Holding Corp. v. DiLoretoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API