Legal Opinion
M.Z. Discount Clothing Corp. v. Meyninger
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 17, 1998No. CV 96-4828(RJD)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
DEARIE, District Judge.
The plaintiff, M.Z. Discount Clothing Corporation, (“M.Z.Discount”) has moved for reargument pursuant to Local Rule 3(j) of this Court's decision of November 12, 1997. For the reasons given below, the motion to reargue is denied in part and granted in part.
1. Prior Proceedings
M.Z. Discount commenced this action to recover insurance policy proceeds arising out of a burglary. Defendant, Underwriters at Lloyds (“Lloyds”) filed a motion to dismiss, which the Court, having relied on materials beyond the pleadings, treated as a motion for summary judgment.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mighty Midgets, Inc. v. Centennial InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Haas Tobacco Co. v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Morgan Guar. Trust Co. of NY v. Garrett Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Violette v. Armonk Associates, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Ades v. Deloitte & ToucheDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- IMC Global v. Continental InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Northrop Grumman Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Chicago Insurance v. BorsodyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- IMC Global v. Continental Insurance v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007