Legal Opinion

Hays v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1940No. L. A. 17298Published

1Opinion of the Court

16 Cal.2d 260 (1940)

JACK HAYS, Petitioner,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent.

L. A. No. 17298.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

October 2, 1940.

William C. Ring for Petitioner.

J. H. O'Connor, County Counsel, Douglas De Coster, Deputy County Counsel, Loyd Wright and Charles E. Millikan for Respondent.

SPENCE, J., pro tem.

Petitioner seeks a peremptory writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to order Gertrude Temple, defendant in the case of Hays v. Temple et al., being action numbered 407-515 in the files of respondent court, to give her deposition.

Said action was…

Also in this document: Dissent · Carter; Dissent · Edmonds.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Matter of FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Hays v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Burns v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. S.F. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1908

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API