Legal Opinion

Lafargue-Guilardi v. Guilardi

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 2011No. H035037PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*772Opinion

ELIA, J.

After a protracted but unsuccessful effort to set aside a marital settlement agreement (MSA), appellant Joanne Lafargue-Guilardi (Wife) moved for pendente lite attorney fees for the proceeding, citing Family Code section 2030. The family court granted the motion of respondent Benjamin Guilardi (Husband) to dismiss Wife’s request, finding an implicit waiver of statutory fees in the MSA. Wife appeals, contending that any waiver of attorney fees is inconsistent with the MSA and the law. Wife further contests the lower court’s alternative finding that attorney fees for the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Fox v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Locke Paddon v. Locke PaddonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Patton v. PattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marriage of BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API