Legal Opinion

Michigan Mutual Liability Company v. Arrien

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 10, 1964PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMIERI, District Judge.

The plaintiffs move for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Their action seeks to permanently enjoin enforcement of a compensation award of the Deputy Commissioner. 33 U.S.C. § 921(b). The defendants cross-move for summary judgment.

The Facts

There is no substantial dispute as to the facts giving rise to the compensation award.

On September 4,1963, Isidoro Parisi, a longshoreman employed by the Pittston Stevedoring Corporation, was injured while discharging cargo from the S.S. Copiapo as a member of a longshoremen’s gang. At the time of the accident, he was…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bernard Harney v. William M. Moore Building Corporation and Lopier Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  2. Johnson v. TraynorDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1965
  3. Marine Stevedoring Corp. v. OostingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
  4. Garrisey v. Westshore Marina AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Lane v. Universal Stevedoring Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API