Pritchett v. Road Improvement District No. 4

This case has been here on a former appeal, and, as all the facts concerning it are stated in the former opinion (158 Ark. 285), it is unnecessary to restate them.

On the first trial of the issues the jury rendered a verdict in favor of appellant for tfie recovery of tfie sum of $1,600, and on tfie appeal we field tfiat tfie undisputed evidence adduced by appellant showed tfiat fie was entitled to recover a sum largely in excess of tfiat amount, and we remanded tfie case for a new trial. Appellee did not introduce any testimony either on tfie first trial or tfie last, and the testimony…