Legal Opinion
Rose v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 14, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Civil actions to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant, consolidated and tried together, as both cases rest upon the same fact situation or arise out of the same crossing accident. Fleming v. Holleman, 190 N.C. 449,130 S.E. 171.
Plaintiffs were returning from a fishing trip on the night of 20 July, 1934, in McDaniel's car, driven by Rose, when they ran into a Texaco oil tank car of defendant's freight train standing across the highway in the town of Hobgood, N.C. at about the hour of 10 p.m., and injured both of the plaintiffs. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Dickey v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Fleming v. HollemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Fleming v. . HollemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Sessoms v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Norfolk Southern Ry. Co. v. SwindellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Morris v. Winston-Salem Southbound Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Southern Pac. Co. v. HaightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Southern Pac. Co. v. HaightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942