Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Ezor

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 2, 2000No. S00G0613PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Justice.

This Court granted certiorari to consider the Court of Appeals’ ruling that the self-contradictory testimony rule of Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc., 1 does not apply to the testimony of a non-party expert witness who submits an OCGA § 9-11-9.1 affidavit in support of a claim of professional malpractice. 2 Having considered this Court’s precedent regarding the self-contradictory testimony rule, and the rationale behind the Prophecy opinion’s application of that rule to summary judgment proceedings, we decline to extend the rule to the testimony of a non-party expert…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. 0-1 Doctors Memorial Holding Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Ezor v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Douglas v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Rodrigues v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. BelcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. Progressive Mountain Insurance Company v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  4. Knight v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. Conrad v. ConradSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API