Thompson v. Ezor
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sears, Justice.
This Court granted certiorari to consider the Court of Appeals’ ruling that the self-contradictory testimony rule of Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc., 1 does not apply to the testimony of a non-party expert witness who submits an OCGA § 9-11-9.1 affidavit in support of a claim of professional malpractice. 2 Having considered this Court’s precedent regarding the self-contradictory testimony rule, and the rationale behind the Prophecy opinion’s application of that rule to summary judgment proceedings, we decline to extend the rule to the testimony of a non-party expert…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- 0-1 Doctors Memorial Holding Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Ezor v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Douglas v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Rodrigues v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. BelcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Progressive Mountain Insurance Company v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Knight v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Conrad v. ConradSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.