Foley v. Day Bros.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummtjs, J.
The emergency price control act of January 30, 1942, c. 26, Title II, § 205 (e) (56 U. S. Sts. at Large, 34), and the amendment thereof made by the stabilization extension act of June 30, 1944, c. 325, Title I, § 108 (b) (58 U. S. Sts. at Large, 640; U. S. C. [1940 ed.] Sup. IV, Title 50, Appendix, § 925 [e], page 1062), give the buyer of a commodity sold in violation of a regulation, order or price schedule prescribing a maximum price, a right of action against the seller, but only if the buyer buys such commodity “for use or consumption other than in the course of trade or business.”…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lightbody v. RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
3Cited by7 opinions
- Young v. MargiottaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Gaddy v. SilvermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Grindle v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Armour & Co. v. BlindmanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
- Bayne v. KingeryWashington Supreme Court · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.