Legal Opinion

Foley v. Day Bros.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 2, 1946PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummtjs, J.

The emergency price control act of January 30, 1942, c. 26, Title II, § 205 (e) (56 U. S. Sts. at Large, 34), and the amendment thereof made by the stabilization extension act of June 30, 1944, c. 325, Title I, § 108 (b) (58 U. S. Sts. at Large, 640; U. S. C. [1940 ed.] Sup. IV, Title 50, Appendix, § 925 [e], page 1062), give the buyer of a commodity sold in violation of a regulation, order or price schedule prescribing a maximum price, a right of action against the seller, but only if the buyer buys such commodity “for use or consumption other than in the course of trade or business.”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lightbody v. RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Young v. MargiottaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  2. Gaddy v. SilvermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Grindle v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  4. Armour & Co. v. BlindmanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
  5. Bayne v. KingeryWashington Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API