Legal Opinion
Armour & Co. v. Blindman
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 28, 1947No. Civil Action No. 2260PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
The following necessary facts are stipulated for the purposes of these motions: (1) Between December 14, 1942, and September 17, 1945, defendants made overceiling sales to plaintiff of certain industrial wooden boxes of various sizes; (2) the prices of said industrial wooden boxes were, under the Emergency Price Control Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq., to be determined by a formula, and plaintiff at the time of purchase had no reason to believe that the price it was paying was in excess of the ceiling established under the Act; (3) the defendants guaranteed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bowles v. Glick Bros. Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Bowles v. ChewDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1944
- International Spangles Corp. v. Marrow Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Webster v. U. S. I. Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bledsoe v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., Inc. v. Allied Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Bledsoe v. Coxe Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Schlenker v. Thorne, Neale & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1949