Legal Opinion
Grace v. Croninger
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1936No. Civ. 9607PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
This is an action by a lessor based upon a written guaranty of the covenants of a lease. Some of the facts are set forth in the opinion in Grace v. Croninger, 56 Cal. App. 659 [206 Pac. 130], which litigation involved a claim for rent accruing prior to the time that this action was commenced. The complaint herein was filed in June, 1919, at which time the other litigation was still pending. The lessor sought by the original complaint in this action to recover additional rent which had become due upon the premises up to and including the month of June, 1919, together with attorney’s fees.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kitson v. Mayor of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- O'Byrne v. HenleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Industrial Development & Land Co. v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Standard Brewing Co. v. WeilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
- Teller v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lloyd v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Davidson v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1943
- August E. Waegemann, Barbara A. Waegemann, and Earl Tom Pyle v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Brown v. OshiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- 2814 Food Corp. v. Hub Bar Building Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.