Legal Opinion

Lyle v. Durham

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1984No. C-830319PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

Plaintiff-appellee, Reginald 0. Lyle, sued defendant-appellant, Donna Durham, for conversion of an engagement ring and a wedding band. The trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment for liability only. The parties stipulated that $2,000 was the value of the rings, and the trial court awarded plaintiff judgment in that amount plus interest from the date of the filing of the complaint. Defendant appeals.

Although we find that the trial court applied the proper law with respect to engagement rings, 1 we reverse, because we hold that there remains a genuine issue of material fact.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gaden v. GadenNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Cincinnati Insurance v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Klipfel v. NeillColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Cincinnati Finance Co. v. BoothOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Albanese v. IndelicatoUnited States District Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wozniak v. WozniakOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Heiman v. ParrishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. Albinger v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Associated Industries v. Keystone General, Inc. (In Re Keystone General, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
  5. Campbell v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API