Cincinnati Finance Co. v. Booth
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
This was an ordinary action in conversion, with a second cause of action for the recovery of dividends declared upon the stock claimed to have been converted, and for exemplary and compensatory damages by reason of the wrongful conversion.
There are certain things found by the courts below which narrow this inquiry down to the question of the measure of damages in a ease of this character. Both courts below found that thercwas a conversion of the stock in question, the court of common pleas finding for Booth, the plaintiff below, nominal damages only. The Court of Appeals reversing this…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Wozniak v. WozniakOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Wiebold Studio, Inc. v. Old World Restorations, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Lyle v. DurhamOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Pure Oil Co. v. Hunt, Recr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933
- Agostinelli v. Debartolo Realty Corp., Unpublished Decision (12-19-2001)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.